top of page

Areas Of Consolidation

I would like to open this discussion with my understanding of Areas of Consolidation (AOC) and how we can use them to identify high probability, low risk trades. Much of that which follows is drawn from principles described by Niall of LTTTM and Sam Seiden, I'm simply aiming to consolidate () those principles to our methodology.

Supply and Demand.

The methodology employed by Sam Seiden is based on identifying areas or levels in the market where there is an imbalance between buyers and sellers that causes price to move either higher or lower. Those imbalances are the fundamental reason for price movement and are identified here by our EA.

The Players.

Seiden identifies two market participants, Institutions and Retail Traders. The Institutions are sophisticated, professional traders with massive accounts. The Retail Traders are unsophisticated, amateur traders with small accounts. The Institutions make money by buying at wholesale (low) prices and selling at retail (high) prices or, selling at retail prices and buying at wholesale prices. The Retail Traders consistently transfer their wealth to the Institutions because they make the same mistakes time after time.

1. They buy or sell after a period of buying/selling
2. They buy or sell at, or into, a level of supply or demand.

In other words, the Retail Traders buy high (retail) into Supply and sell low (wholesale) into Demand which is the opposite of the Institutional traders.

Areas Of Consolidation (AOC's).

AOC's occur when price is contained between supply and demand, forming one or more inside bars until such time as it can form a new directional move. AOC's can form at swing high/low's and initiate long term directional moves or, mid trend during a period of Mean Reversion following which price continues in the direction of the trend. Niall uses AOC's as one of his trading set ups, you'll recognise them as the "Fakey" which he looks to enter at key levels of support/resistance or, with dynamic support/resistance from Exponential Moving Averages (EMA's). Niall recently won a trading competition and took home the first prize of $1,000,000.00 which is testament to his methodology and skill as a trader. Congratulations Niall!!

Niall primarily uses momentum to enter Fakey setups. In a bullish Fakey, entry is at the high with the expectation that price will move up, trigger the trade and continue higher. The opposite is expected for a Bearish Fakey. While there is no disputing the effectiveness and profitability of Niall's methodology, I've always felt uneasy about buying the high of a bullish fakey or the low of a bearish fakey. I always felt like I was getting in late and carrying too much risk.

For me, entering at the high in a bullish fakey is buying after a period of buying (mistake 1) and into a level of supply (mistake 2). On the other hand, the Major Fakey that Niall teaches, where there is a false break of the MB low is gold. Again, Niall uses momentum to enter at the high but if we can identify these AOC's before the false break, we can enter at the low in a Bullish move or at the High in a Bearish move therefore reducing risk and increasing profit.

 

In the above chart, we have identified a standard support level which price has tested and rejected. I haven't highlighted it here, but note just prior to the retest, there is an AOC (inside bar).
 

As price moved down to test support, it stalls at 1, then there is a strong move into support at 2 which is rejected and forms the MB. Four inside bars follow, then at 3, a False Break (Major Fakey) completing a Bull Trap.
 

Now that price is at support, we should be asking the questions, "Who is buying?" and "Who is selling?". We're into support with a level of demand below which prevented price from moving lower. Therefore, we should expect that the Institutions should have their buy orders (Wholesale) somewhere below the MB low. The only traders who would be selling at these levels, looking for a move lower are the Retail Traders. 1. They selling after a period of selling and 2, they are selling into an area of Demand.

Once we have the first inside bar, we can set a buy limit order at the MB low with a predetermined stop at 33% of the MB range. This gives us the potential for 3R+ assuming we don't get stopped out and the trade moves to the MB high.

This is a strategy we can use where there are no obvious zones to enter from. Ideally, applying our methodology, a Demand zone immediately below the MB low and within 33% of the MB range would represent a great opportunity. Entering at the zone could get filled at a lower price, while having a defined stop below the MB gives us the opportunity to get into the trade in the event price doesn't test the zone.

Some backtesting that I've done on Major Fakeys at support/resistance has found that the average false break is 29% of the MB range and 78% went on to make 3R or more. It was a small sample, 68 setups, pure price action, no support/resistance levels or zones.

I'll post some examples with zones later. In the mean time, happy to discuss this with anyone who is interested.

     Choice
Top Broker's 
bottom of page